I interviewed the former Leningrader and writer of “autofiction.” I’ll also be hosting a reading and discussion with Iossel tomorrow, May 13th at 4PM.

Here’s a recap of a forum I did on alternative grading practices as part of Transformative Learning in the Humanities.

Flipping the Script on Grading: Alternative, Anti-Racist Grading Practices, Event Recap

“In societies such as ours, it is unusual for anyone describable as an intellectual to feel a very deep attachment to his own country. Public opinion — that is, the section of public opinion of which he as an intellectual is aware — will not allow him to do so. Most of the people surrounding him are sceptical and disaffected, and he may adopt the same attitude from imitativeness or sheer cowardice: in that case he will have abandoned the form of nationalism that lies nearest to hand without getting any closer to a genuinely internationalist outlook. He still feels the need for a Fatherland, and it is natural to look for one somewhere abroad. Having found it, he can wallow unrestrainedly in exactly those emotions from which he believes that he has emancipated himself. God, the King, the Empire, the Union Jack — all the overthrown idols can reappear under different names, and because they are not recognised for what they are they can be worshipped with a good conscience. Transferred nationalism, like the use of scapegoats, is a way of attaining salvation without altering one’s conduct.”

I know some white leftists with this issue.